2026 submissions are complete! We'll announce the winners at the end of October.
Subscribe to our ROAR newsletter to stay updated!
2026 Contest
- GRC writing competition, with a cash prize for 3 winners.
- The competition is open to all Risky Women.
- The aim of the competition is to promote diverse female voices in GRC and raise awareness of our talented Risky Women and the network.
Scope & Eligibility
Participants should submit an article of 700-900 words on a GRC topic of their choosing. Articles should promote female voices in Risk & Compliance – either the voice of the author, or by drawing on public contributions made by GRC professionals.
Competition submission period starts 15 July 2026 and ends 19 Sept 2026.
Prizes
First place: $US500
Second place: $US300
Third place: $US200
Winners also receive:
- 1 year complimentary Risky Women membership to first 30 entrants
- Publication on Risky Women blog series, Ocorian, Compliance Week
- Profile of winners on Risky Women LinkedIn
- Top 3 interviewed on the Risky Women Podcast
Evaluation Criteria (50 pts)
Originality – the x factor! (20 points)
- Does the article offer a genuinely new idea, perspective or challenge to conventional thinking or an overlooked issue?
- Would a reader learn something they are unlikely to find elsewhere?
- Would readers remember this article because it changed how they think about the topic?
Expertise – what do you know about this? (10 points)
- Does the article move the conversation forward rather than simply summarise what is already known?
- Does it provide a distinctive point of view and demonstrate the author’s unique expertise and experience?
- Does the article translate expertise into practical implications or actionable recommendations?
Accessibility & Engagement – how will you get people to read it? (10 points)
- Was the article drafted with a general audience in mind. Does it avoid jargon, unnecessarily complex language and clearly explain GRC concepts?
- Is the article engaging to read?
- Is the article well-written and grammatically correct?
Compelling Argument – how will you convince them? (10 points)
- Are the arguments persuasive and bold? Articles should take a clear stance on the chosen issue and demonstrate a strong rationale for their argument.
Judges

Kimberley Cole

Lucy Pearman - USA

Carol Beaumier - USA

Rebecca Thorpe - UK

Aaron Nicodemus - USA

Aya Lowe - HK

Laura Steer - SG

Gloria Yuen - AU

Nicole Rose - AU

Rikke Stampe Skov - DK
Sponsored by
Ocorian are specialists in financial regulation. Whether you need a partner to deliver regulatory change, support dealing with the regulator, help with day-to-day compliance, or simply peace of mind you’re on the right track, they’re here to help.
2025 Winners
Female Oversight: The Key to Building Ethical AI in Femtech
The Mythmaker’s Guide to GRC: Greeks, Romans & Risk Management
Embedded Supervision – an Idea Whose Time is Coming?
Podcast S8E14 | Embedded Supervision with Susannah Hammond
Podcast S9E2 | Obituary for the Risk Matrix with Sabrina Segal
Podcast S9E3 | Female Oversight with Roosa Rosti
Podcast S9E4 | Greeks, Romans & Risk Management with Lucy Morley
T&Cs
Articles remain the property of the authors, but by submitting them the authors give Risky Women the right to publish them.



